327
Findings · one real pack
A senior's second pair of eyes on the pack — before you're the only pair.
Your junior does the first pass. You check their work — across 160 documents, under a tender deadline. The mistake that ships as a drawing comes back as a variation. VerifIQ reads the whole pack first and hands you a ranked, source-quoted shortlist of what to read closely. You decide what matters. You verify locally. You sign.
Work email required · €29 · your first 25 drawings · one per practice
4.1The Contract Sum shall be the amount stated in the Tender and inclusive of all obligations under the Contract.
4.2Date for Substantial Completion: ____________
4.3Liquidated damages shall apply in accordance with PW-CF5 Clause 9.5.
But checking a junior's work still means reading the whole pack to know what to check.
Specs cut-and-pasted from the last job, schedules half-filled, a standard that was withdrawn two years ago.
160 documents, five disciplines, a tender date anchored to a programme milestone. Nobody reads all of it closely.
A blank completion date, an REI 30 against a Condition that reads 60 — surfaced post-award as a variation, not pre-issue as an RFI.
Twenty drawings catch the small things. The whole pack — read against itself — catches the expensive ones.
One discipline, the obvious catches — outdated references, missing entries, cut-paste from a prior project. A taste of the method on your own scope.
Upload the technical and general specs, the particulars, and the form of contract alongside the drawings — and VerifIQ checks that the design specification is actually met by the technical requirements, across every discipline, against the contract. That cross-reference is where the variations hide.
Architect vs structures vs M&E vs fire vs electrical — spec against schedule against drawing. The interface gaps between teams who drew their parts separately.
Does the design specification actually meet the particular and technical requirements it cites? The gap between what's required and what's drawn.
Are the design documents consistent with the public-works form of contract (PW-CF5 and the CWMF suite)? The clauses that bite at award.
Withdrawn or superseded standards, and IS-versus-BS jurisdictional mis-references that don't belong in an Irish pack.
Because free trials get farmed with throwaway emails and tell us nothing. €29 on a work card means you're a real practice with a real pack — and it gets you a real result, not a demo. This is the first-pack rate, not the rate card.
For the €29 First Read, up to 25 drawings from one discipline. For the full power, upload everything — drawings, the technical and general specifications, the particulars, and the form of contract. The more complete the pack, the more the cross-reference finds.
This is a tool for practising design teams, and we keep it that way. Work email only, one First Read per practice — no anonymous sign-ups, no abuse.
No. VerifIQ is a reading aid. It surfaces, in the documents' own words, what a registered professional may wish to read closely. It does not certify, sign, or opine. You read it, you exercise your judgement, you verify locally, you sign.
Not the 3,000 pages.
Work email required · one First Read per practice
VerifIQ is a software-based reading aid. It surfaces, in the documents' own words, what a registered professional may wish to read closely. It does not certify, sign, opine, or substitute for professional judgement. The registered designer reads our output, exercises their own judgement, verifies locally, and signs. The professional indemnity remains theirs. We carry product-quality risk only.