— Drawing 12 · About

Who reads your pack.

VerifIQ is a small atelier in Dublin, run inside GovIQ Ltd. During the pilot cohort, one chartered eye reads every paid pack — yours. We tell you who, with what scope, and what we hand off as the panel forms.

The pilot reviewer.

Honest, scoped, specialism-named. Findings outside this scope are surfaced — never signed by this reviewer.

Liam Doolan
Founder · VerifIQ · GovIQ Ltd

Specialist in Irish public-sector capital delivery. Background in procurement governance, CWMF / PW-CF contract governance, and tender-pack coordination across HSE / OPW / local-authority capital programmes. The reviewer signing your pilot pack.

— Bench experience

Capital delivery · multi-discipline coordination · contract-form (PW-CF) audit · CWMF / OGP procurement · BCAR doc-set hygiene · public-sector tender packs at Stage 2C / 3 / 4

What Liam signs as the reviewer:

  • ✓Contract-form coherence (PW-CF variants, LD mechanics, Dates)
  • ✓CWMF / OGP procurement risk
  • ✓Tender-pack document hygiene (versions, dates, registers, completeness)
  • ✓BCAR doc-set completeness (NOT BCAR Assigned Certifier function)
  • ✓Cross-discipline coordination (spec vs schedule vs drawing)
  • ✓Cost / QS coordination (BoQ vs spec coordination)
  • ✓Address / title block / metadata anomalies
  • ✓Standards prefix / typo flags (e.g., "I.S. EN 10101" does not exist)

What Liam does NOT sign — pending specialist join:

  • ✕Architectural design adequacy / TGD B alignment — RIAI Architect required
  • ✕Structural design / Eurocode application — CEng C&S required
  • ✕M&E specification adequacy — CEng MEP required
  • ✕Fire engineering / cause-and-effect — FSE / IFSE required
  • ✕Detailed energy / Part L alignment — SEAI-registered EED required
  • ✕BCAR Assigned Certifier function — out of VerifIQ scope, ever

Findings in these disciplines are still surfaced on the pack — they appear on your register marked as "AI-surfaced · pending chartered review · [discipline]" until the relevant specialist joins the cohort. You see everything; you know exactly what level of human review backs each finding.

+ Architecture · RIAI · joining + Structures · CEng C&S · joining + M&E · CEng MEP · joining + Fire · FSE · joining

Why this matters.

Most software products for the design industry oversell. They imply chartered review where none is happening, or hide the reviewer's identity behind a "panel" trademark that nobody at the company has actually been to.

VerifIQ takes the opposite posture. The reviewer is named. The discipline scope is published. Findings outside scope are marked. The audit log carries the reviewer's initials. If we cannot back a finding with a chartered eye, we say so on the register — we do not pretend.

This is what makes the pilot cohort an actual pilot, not a launch dressed up as one. As discipline specialists join — Architecture · Structures · M&E · Fire — the "pending chartered review" tags retire one discipline at a time, with each new reviewer's name appearing on the bio page alongside Liam's.

When all four are in place and operational across enough live packs, the cohort closes and the product moves to standard release at full panel cover.

The atelier, in numbers.

1
Pilot reviewer
4
Packs per week cap
327
Findings · validation pack
10
Pilot seats open
— Notice · Locked Disclaimer

VerifIQ is a software-based reading aid. It surfaces, in the documents' own words, what a registered professional may wish to read closely. It does not certify, sign, opine, or substitute for professional judgement. The registered designer reads our output, exercises their own judgement, verifies locally, and signs. The professional indemnity remains theirs. We carry product-quality risk only.